Ah money and markets.
These concepts are always sticky subjects in France. One of the first things I
heard about the difference between the two countries is that money is an impolite
subject in France, at least in general discussion. French people, on the other
hand, often hear that Americans freely talk about money with one another, even
with strangers, from their salaries to the price of their cars.
From a French viewpoint,
America is the epitome of a consumer society. After all, we are the country
that brought the world McDonald's, Starbucks, and Apple products. At its best,
our competitive capitalism can be seen as an example of American individualism,
where every person has a right to seek his/her own wealth. And if big American
brands have been imported internationally, then it’s just a result of American
‘pragmatics’ and ingenuity. In other words, some would say that Americans
culturally have a special relationship with money that allows them to excel at
commercialism and mass production.
At its worst, this
exportation can also be viewed as a cultural colonization, where the United
States is (yet again) trying to impose itself on the rest of the world. It’s not
surprising that this doesn’t always go over well in France, where there is a
fierce protection of patrimoine (cultural heritage) and tradition. However, the
French are often in quite a compromising situation. While many may be
self-proclaimed socialists and communists, others have come to really love
American brands like McDonald's, and also appreciate the freedom of American
markets.
I bring up this debate
to talk about a recent very controversial event in France tied to money. At the
end of December 2012, France’s government voted on a 75% income tax for the
highest income brackets in the country (individuals who earn over 1million
euros per year, or 1.34 million dollars). The vote was introduced by the new
president, François Hollande, but was struck down by the Constitutional Court,
both because it the rate was found too high and because the way it taxed
individuals didn’t correspond to France’s taxing system (which taxes based on combined
household income, for more on this, read http://www.france24.com/en/20121229-france-tax-hollande-depardieu-75-percent-tax-rate).
This proposal sparked
extensive media coverage of wealthy French millionaires who decided to
officially move out of France to other European countries like Belgium. The
most outrageous reaction was from well-known French actor Gerard Depardieu, who
was publicly criticized by France’s Prime Minister, Jean-Marc Ayrault for
leaving the country. Depardieu made quite a stink about the proposal and even
went so far as to surrender his French citizenship for a Russian passport.
This whole idea of a 75
percent tax rate is just perplexing for Americans, and shows this major
difference in mentality where money is concerned between the two countries.
France is a now run by a socialist president, and is constantly looking to its
European neighbors and their economic models, while also being aware of the
American model. But the fact that a 75 percent income tax could even be
proposed says something about the French mentality and money. Even though the
proposal didn’t pass, it shows that this kind of high tax rate is still a
possibility in France. In discussing the issue with French people, some have
told me that this was a very good career move for President François Hollande because
much of the country supported the tax. The idea behind all of this is then that
no one should have too much money, and if they do, then they better be ready to
share a large chunk of it with the state. In my opinion, this is the very
opposite of the so-called ‘American dream’ where everyone can, with hard work
and perseverance, succeed financially and socially.
On the other side of
things, when we’re not talking about the richest of the rich members of society
in France, money is also different for the middle class. I return to something
I once discussed in a conversation with a Franco-American couple. The topic of
money came up and the couple admitted to loving the lifestyle in France, but
returning to the US whenever they really wanted to make money or save up for
big purchases. It’s true that in the US, salaries tend to be higher and we have
less taxes (compare the 9.5% sales tax of the city of Chicago with the 19%
sales tax in France). There is less job stability but it’s also easier to get
hired. In short, it’s easier to make money, and more money, in the US.
On the other hand, while
taxes are higher, job contracts more binding and jobs harder to find, the
quality of life in France is very high, in my opinion. Even if you don’t make a
lot of money, everyone still has health care, probably about 5 weeks of vacation
per year, and strong unemployment benefits. It’s harder to strike it rich, but
you’re more protected by the government. In the US, you can pursue the American
dream and become wealthy if you work hard, but if you fall there aren’t as many
government supports.
And so, money is a
sticky subject between the two countries. In one, you may have less of it (per
capita) but you have other services in return. In the other, it seems the sky is
the limit, but there are fewer safety nets in times of crisis. Maybe Depardieu
should have considered moving the US.
Ah, but is Depardieu so well known for his ketchup adverts in the USA?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzB04XX_xpI
Enjoyed this article, and, although I don't comment often, I've enjoyed reading your others.
Not as many government supports? There are many in the USA who live entirely on government supports. Two years ado, I read an obituary of a twenty-six year old man, who had ten children, and received $105,000 in aid from the governmant. The taxpayers were paying him to have babies. Would he have received even more had he lived in France?
ReplyDeleteJames - no, I can't say the ketchup adverts are common knowledge in the US, although this is quite a gem.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous - that sounds like a fairly extreme (as in not everyday) case. Regardless, I would still say France has more government supports. Some examples: I, as a foreigner, could go on unemployment tomorrow without any problem. Last time I lived in France the government also subsidized my rent, by reimbursing me 200 euros every month. Different systems that fit in with different mentalities I suppose.
4,300,000 Americans (4.1% of working population) live entirely on welfare, at a cost 131.9 billion dollars a year. This does not include the 46,700,000 receiving food stamps. In 2010 the US spent 184.7 billion on unemployment. The US government has budgeted 600 billion dollars for welfare spending in 2013. Maybe the US doesn't have as many supports as France, but still they pay a huge sum of money to a large percentage of the population (ie: food stamps). Over the past 6 years, the US is trending towards becoming a "welfare state".
Delete