Skip to main content

Dirty Money

Ah money and markets. These concepts are always sticky subjects in France. One of the first things I heard about the difference between the two countries is that money is an impolite subject in France, at least in general discussion. French people, on the other hand, often hear that Americans freely talk about money with one another, even with strangers, from their salaries to the price of their cars.

From a French viewpoint, America is the epitome of a consumer society. After all, we are the country that brought the world McDonald's, Starbucks, and Apple products. At its best, our competitive capitalism can be seen as an example of American individualism, where every person has a right to seek his/her own wealth. And if big American brands have been imported internationally, then it’s just a result of American ‘pragmatics’ and ingenuity. In other words, some would say that Americans culturally have a special relationship with money that allows them to excel at commercialism and mass production.

At its worst, this exportation can also be viewed as a cultural colonization, where the United States is (yet again) trying to impose itself on the rest of the world. It’s not surprising that this doesn’t always go over well in France, where there is a fierce protection of patrimoine (cultural heritage) and tradition. However, the French are often in quite a compromising situation. While many may be self-proclaimed socialists and communists, others have come to really love American brands like McDonald's, and also appreciate the freedom of American markets.

I bring up this debate to talk about a recent very controversial event in France tied to money. At the end of December 2012, France’s government voted on a 75% income tax for the highest income brackets in the country (individuals who earn over 1million euros per year, or 1.34 million dollars). The vote was introduced by the new president, François Hollande, but was struck down by the Constitutional Court, both because it the rate was found too high and because the way it taxed individuals didn’t correspond to France’s taxing system (which taxes based on combined household income, for more on this, read

This proposal sparked extensive media coverage of wealthy French millionaires who decided to officially move out of France to other European countries like Belgium. The most outrageous reaction was from well-known French actor Gerard Depardieu, who was publicly criticized by France’s Prime Minister, Jean-Marc Ayrault for leaving the country. Depardieu made quite a stink about the proposal and even went so far as to surrender his French citizenship for a Russian passport.

This whole idea of a 75 percent tax rate is just perplexing for Americans, and shows this major difference in mentality where money is concerned between the two countries. France is a now run by a socialist president, and is constantly looking to its European neighbors and their economic models, while also being aware of the American model. But the fact that a 75 percent income tax could even be proposed says something about the French mentality and money. Even though the proposal didn’t pass, it shows that this kind of high tax rate is still a possibility in France. In discussing the issue with French people, some have told me that this was a very good career move for President François Hollande because much of the country supported the tax. The idea behind all of this is then that no one should have too much money, and if they do, then they better be ready to share a large chunk of it with the state. In my opinion, this is the very opposite of the so-called ‘American dream’ where everyone can, with hard work and perseverance, succeed financially and socially.   

On the other side of things, when we’re not talking about the richest of the rich members of society in France, money is also different for the middle class. I return to something I once discussed in a conversation with a Franco-American couple. The topic of money came up and the couple admitted to loving the lifestyle in France, but returning to the US whenever they really wanted to make money or save up for big purchases. It’s true that in the US, salaries tend to be higher and we have less taxes (compare the 9.5% sales tax of the city of Chicago with the 19% sales tax in France). There is less job stability but it’s also easier to get hired. In short, it’s easier to make money, and more money, in the US.

On the other hand, while taxes are higher, job contracts more binding and jobs harder to find, the quality of life in France is very high, in my opinion. Even if you don’t make a lot of money, everyone still has health care, probably about 5 weeks of vacation per year, and strong unemployment benefits. It’s harder to strike it rich, but you’re more protected by the government. In the US, you can pursue the American dream and become wealthy if you work hard, but if you fall there aren’t as many government supports.

And so, money is a sticky subject between the two countries. In one, you may have less of it (per capita) but you have other services in return. In the other, it seems the sky is the limit, but there are fewer safety nets in times of crisis. Maybe Depardieu should have considered moving the US.    


  1. Ah, but is Depardieu so well known for his ketchup adverts in the USA?

    Enjoyed this article, and, although I don't comment often, I've enjoyed reading your others.

  2. Not as many government supports? There are many in the USA who live entirely on government supports. Two years ado, I read an obituary of a twenty-six year old man, who had ten children, and received $105,000 in aid from the governmant. The taxpayers were paying him to have babies. Would he have received even more had he lived in France?

  3. James - no, I can't say the ketchup adverts are common knowledge in the US, although this is quite a gem.

    Anonymous - that sounds like a fairly extreme (as in not everyday) case. Regardless, I would still say France has more government supports. Some examples: I, as a foreigner, could go on unemployment tomorrow without any problem. Last time I lived in France the government also subsidized my rent, by reimbursing me 200 euros every month. Different systems that fit in with different mentalities I suppose.

    1. 4,300,000 Americans (4.1% of working population) live entirely on welfare, at a cost 131.9 billion dollars a year. This does not include the 46,700,000 receiving food stamps. In 2010 the US spent 184.7 billion on unemployment. The US government has budgeted 600 billion dollars for welfare spending in 2013. Maybe the US doesn't have as many supports as France, but still they pay a huge sum of money to a large percentage of the population (ie: food stamps). Over the past 6 years, the US is trending towards becoming a "welfare state".


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Autumn Blues (English version)

Why the French Don't Get Fat

If you were intrigued by this title and are looking for the answer to this question, I'm sorry to disappoint. There is no magical French anti-fat gene. The French do, in fact, "get fat". I chose this title because it's a common stereotype we hear of the French, things like "they eat all that cheese and fatty food, and yet have lower levels of cardiovascular disease". People tend to attribute this to drinking wine, or the Mediterranean diet based on olive oil.
Let's look at the facts. An OECD study published in 2014 showed that France has a rising rate of obesity, whereas countries like the US have levelled off.[1]But other statistics show clearly that the US is still far ahead of France in terms of the obesity rate. Depending on your source, the US has approximately twice the percentage of obese adults as in France (anywhere from 24-26 % for the US, and 12-18% for France)[2]. So yes, the French do get fat, but seemingly not as fat as Americans. Even with…

The Aftermath of the American Election

I'll admit, I wanted to post sooner but I have been avoiding the elephant in the room: politics and the American election.
We talked a lot about the election in my lessons with my students, starting with the primaries last winter. We looked at the general election procedure, talked about the big issues, studied the electoral college, watched debate excerpts etc. There is no doubt that this election was particularly rich for discussion. And it also caused great disappointment.
I was surprised actually after the election how much solidarity French people expressed with Americans and the election results. And I quickly realized that their solidarity wasn't just because they were sympathetic. It was because they were scared the same thing is going to happen in France...and it could.
The win of Donald Trump reflects back their own fears about the rise of the French right-wing populist and nationalist party, a party that has been gaining in momentum and popularity since the last elect…